28 Years Later: The Bone Temple – 5 Ways Through Which The Aaron Taylor-Johnson & Jodie Comer Starrer Film Pushes The Franchise Forward

The 28 franchise has always been about more than rage-infected bodies sprinting through empty streets. With 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple, that idea is finally pushed to its logical extreme. Directed by Nia DaCosta and written by Alex Garland, the film expands the world first imagined by Danny Boyle in 28 Days Later, trading immediacy for reflection and chaos for control.

Featuring a new generation of survivors played by Aaron Taylor-Johnson and Jodie Comer, and standing in conversation with the events of 28 Years Later, The Bone Temple asks a different question than its predecessors: not how the world ended, but what kind of world people chose to build afterward.

Ahead of the film’s release on January 16th, here are five ways through which it meaningfully moves the franchise forward.

1. Humans Fully Replace The Infected As The Central Threat

In 28 Days Later and 28 Weeks Later, the infected were the defining danger. In The Bone Temple, they’re almost acting as the background noise. The real menace comes from people who have had decades to rationalize violence. Compared to 28 Years Later, where survival still feels precarious, The Bone Temple shows a society that has learned to weaponize stability.

Trending

Wicked: For Good North America Box Office – After Beating Jurassic World Rebirth, How Much More Does It Need To Outgross Zootopia

Zootopia 2 China Box Office: Surpasses Avengers: Endgame As Highest-Grossing Hollywood Film Ever, But There’s a Catch!

2. A Cult Replaces The Idea Of Community

Earlier films treated the community as fragile but necessary. Nia DaCosta flips that idea entirely. The cult at the center of The Bone Temple offers structure, protection, and meaning—but at the cost of autonomy. Where 28 Years Later explores fractured alliances, The Bone Temple explores what happens when unity itself becomes the trap.

3. Survival Is No Longer Morally Innocent

Survival in the early films was reactive and quite desperate. Here, it’s procedural. Characters must comply, participate, and sometimes even sacrifice others to ensure their own safety. The film suggests that after 28 years, moral compromise isn’t a side effect of survival – now it’s baked into the system.

4. Horror Shifts From Physical Panic To Psychological Control

Danny Boyle’s originals thrived on speed, disorientation, and honest execution of the script. DaCosta’s approach is more restrained and sometimes even deeply unsettling. Rituals, silence, and implication are used in constant motion. Compared to 28 Years Later, which still carries echoes of outbreak-era urgency, The Bone Temple embraces dread that lingers rather than explodes.

5. Hope Exists, But It’s Dangerous

The franchise has always flirted with hope, but The Bone Temple is likely to treat it as a liability. Hope appears in small, rebellious gestures—sometimes even in moments of empathy that threaten the fragile order holding everything together. If 28 Years Later is about endurance, 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple is more about whether that endurance without humanity is worth taking a shot at all.

Check Out The New Trailer Of 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple Below

For more such updates, check out Hollywood News!

Must Read: Hamnet North America Box Office: Chloé Zhao’s Awards Darling Defies Competition In 6th Weekend

Follow Us: Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | YouTube | Google News