Advertisement
Picture this: Gwyneth Paltrow as Rose in Titanic. Wild, right? It almost happened. Paltrow was right in the mix before Kate Winslet claimed the role and made movie magic with Leonardo DiCaprio. But why didn’t she board the most famous ship in cinema history? It had much to do with corsets, career moves, and James Cameron’s fear of being too predictable.
James Cameron, the mastermind behind Titanic, wanted to avoid the obvious. Winslet was already earning a nickname in Hollywood: “Corset Kate.” By the mid-’90s, she had become synonymous with historical dramas, thanks to roles in Sense and Sensibility, Jude, and Kenneth Branagh’s Hamlet. Casting her as Rose, an early 20th-century socialite, felt almost too predictable for Cameron. “I thought, ‘Oh, man, this is going to look like the laziest casting in the world,’” the director confessed in a GQ interview. But after meeting Winslet, he changed his mind. And thank goodness, because her performance turned out to be unforgettable.
So, where does Gwyneth Paltrow fit into this story? Back in the day, she was in serious contention for Rose. At that time, Paltrow had a more diverse resume. Sure, she had her Austen credit with Emma (1996), but she also turned heads in modern films like Se7en, where she played Brad Pitt’s ill-fated wife. The actress was no stranger to period dramas but wasn’t as typecast as Winslet. In short, she seemed like a wildcard choice for Cameron.
Advertisement
