Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice — Was it Clark Kent’s continuing saga or Bruce Wayne’s big DCEU debut? Here are three arguments for both (Photo Credit – Instagram)

Advertisement

When Zack Snyder brought Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice to theaters in 2016, he gave audiences the first live‑action clash between DC’s, and arguably the comic book world’s, biggest two superheroes. Ben Affleck took on a darker, older Bruce Wayne while Henry Cavill returned as Clark Kent after 2013’s Man of Steel.

But the hype didn’t materialize in success, as Dawn of Justice sharply divided opinions not only at box offices and review forums but even among fans debating whose story was at its center. Was it truly the next chapter in the path of Kal-El, or did Snyder plan it as the Caped Crusader’s solo entry point into the larger shared universe of DCEU? To weigh this fairly, we can look at three reasons that strengthen the claim of Superman being the focus, and three that argue for Batman holding the spotlight.

Advertising
Advertising

3 Reasons Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice Feels Like a Superman Movie

To start it off, the world of Superman predominantly guides the Zack Snyder flick. In fact, its only direct lead‑in was 2013’s Man of Steel, which set up stakes for Clark Kent, Lois Lane, Perry White, and the rest of the Daily Planet staff, as well as characters like Martha Kent. Their presence gives grounding, while in contrast Batman only really shares space with Alfred Pennyworth. Viewers therefore invest more in Clark’s circle than Bruce’s.