Why Emily Brunt Deserves an Oscar for Oppenheimer ( Photo Credit – Instagram )

Advertisement

For her performance in Oppenheimer, Emily Blunt—the formidable actress we all know and adore—deserves an Oscar. But despite performing remarkably as Katherine ‘Kitty’ Oppenheimer, she hasn’t received any Oscar buzz. Hollywood needs to acknowledge her potential and stop casting her in unoriginal parts.

Blunt portrays the role of ‘father of the atomic bomb’ J. Robert Oppenheimer’s wife. Even though Kitty plays a significant part in the movie, she is a walking cliché of the “long-suffering wife.” She plays the ideal of an underutilized female character in a story dominated by men, a problem seen in many Oscar-baiting movies. Blunt plays Kitty so well—almost miraculously, given the restrictions of the role.

Blunt’s depiction of Kitty goes beyond merely being a quintessential example of a supporting part. She deftly steers clear of the clichés with an astonishing and compelling subtlety. Her act turns even the most clichéd situations into unforgettable ones, whether answering phone calls silently or hurling glassware against walls. Blunt makes the role resonate even though it’s more of a sentient martini glass than a fully developed persona.

Advertisement