Yashraj Films Copyright Infringement Case: Delhi High Court Issues Summon To American App ‘Triller’

Yashraj Films Copyright Infringement Case: Delhi HC issues summons for the US based AUdio-Video App "Triller"

Delhi HC issues summons to American app in copyright infringement case by Yashraj Films ( Photo Credit – Facebook )

Advertisement

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday issued a summons and notice to ‘Triller’, an American video-sharing app in a copyright infringement case filed by Indian production house Yashraj Films.

A single-bench judge Justice Amit Bansal was dealing with Yashraj’s interim relief application seeking to restrain Triller from using its copyrighted material.

Advertisement

In its lawsuit, Yashraj has claimed that Triller has an extraction tool that allowed users to post audio-visual content or short videos using Yashraj‘s works.

Advertisement

View Quiz

The plea read: “The defendant illegally uploads, stores, reproduces, makes copies, creates new works embodying the plaintiff’s works, commercially exploits, communicates to the public, makes a sound recording in respect of the plaintiff’s works, adapts, modifies, synchronises and/or otherwise exploits or permits the aforesaid acts by users of the impugned platforms, without a valid license from the plaintiff.”

The bench listed the matter for next hearing on February 2.

Advertisement

According to Triller’s counsel, the conflict between Yashraj and the social media company has been ongoing for some time, and he will follow the company’s directions in this regard.

Triller’s representative further claimed that the social networking platform has not ignored the issue and continues to remove content that violates copyright.

The lawsuit further claimed that even though some of the links mentioned in the warnings had been removed, Triller had not successfully complied with its takedown duty and that other of the links had persisted in being active or had appeared repeatedly.

“It is also pertinent to note that the impugned platforms contain various features, such as the audio extraction feature, which are beyond the limited role of an intermediary specified under Section 79 (2)(a) of the IT Act, thereby disentitling the Defendant from the ‘safe-harbour’ protection guaranteed to intermediaries under the IT Act,” the plea stated.

Advertising
Advertising

Must Read: Raj Kapoor’s Confession On His Mother Saying “Seeing Her N*de Must Have Left Deep Erotic” Resurfaced By KRK, Netizens Call Him A ‘Shameless Person’

Follow Us: Facebook | Instagram | Twitter | Youtube | Google News

Advertisement

Exit mobile version